What are the types of crypto custody solutions and how to choose the right custodian/custody partner?

Securing your crypto isn’t just about keeping it safe; it’s also about how you use it, how often you access it, and how much responsibility you’re willing to take on. Someone who actively trades digital assets has very different custody needs from a long-term investor, just as an individual investor’s requirements differ from those of a business or institution managing millions in crypto. 

While everyone understands the importance of security, choosing the right custody solution depends on factors like risk tolerance, transaction frequency, regulatory obligations, and operational complexity. 

The sections ahead break down the types of crypto custody solutions available, explains how they work along with their benefits and risks, and outline what to look for when selecting a custodian or custody partner. 

The main crypto custody types are self-custody, third-party custody, and hybrid crypto custody models. Here’s everything you need to know about these types of crypto custody.

1. Self-Custody

With self-custody, you are responsible for managing your own private keys via a recovery seed phrase. Your assets are typically stored in hardware wallets or other offline solutions, providing direct control over digital assets without relying on a third-party service.

It is imperative that you implement the best practices for crypto storage, including secure backup of recovery seed phrases and multi-layer security. Loss or compromise of private keys can result in permanent asset loss, with no recovery mechanism, making this option best suited for users with knowledge of wallet setup, key encryption and threat mitigation.

2. Third-Party Custody

Regulated third-party custodians, such as specialised crypto banks, or institutional service providers, manage storage, security, and access to digital assets. These custodians use advanced technology like cold storage for digital assets, multi-signature wallets, and encrypted systems to safeguard private keys. Regulated custodians operating under frameworks like FINMA or FinCEN offer qualified custody with legal asset segregation. Here, the custodian assumes responsibility for crypto asset security, but ensuring regulatory compliance and—in many cases—limited insurance coverage.

However, the tradeoff is that third-party custody improves security but reduces direct control over assets. Clients must rely on the custodian’s financial stability and security practices, often pay custodial fees, and face reduced privacy levels due to regulatory reporting requirements.

3. Hybrid Crypto Custody Model

A hybrid crypto custody model combines elements of self-custody and third-party management. Investors retain control over some signing keys while the custodian controls others, typically through multi-signature wallets that require approvals from both parties to authorise transactions. This distributes control without any single party having unilateral access to assets.

However, while hybrid custody balances control and security while introducing added complexity. It often involves sophisticated setups and partial reliance on the custodian, which can introduce coordination delays and recovery challenges if either party loses access to their keys. Customised infrastructure and controls may also result in higher costs.

Here are the top 5 Factors to consider when choosing a custody model.

1. Investor type and needs
   1. Individuals or Small Investors: Self-custody suits those comfortable managing private keys and seeking full control. Hardware or software wallets offer security but require technical diligence.
   2. High-Net-Worth Individuals or Institutions: Third-party custodians provide regulated custody with institutional-grade security, reducing operational complexity. Many offer insurance coverage, though limits and exclusions vary.
   3. Businesses Requiring Flexibility: Hybrid custody combines user control with professional safeguards, balancing convenience and security for those businesses that need more flexibility in managing their digital assets.
2. Risk tolerance and security requirements

Those comfortable with technical responsibility and operational risk may prefer self-custody for autonomy and privacy, while those seeking institutional safeguards and recovery mechanisms often choose custodial solutions with professional oversight. Look for features like cold storage, multi-signature wallets, and HSMs to mitigate security risks.

3. Technical Expertise and Accessibility Needs

Self-custody requires strong technical knowledge and private key management. Third-party and hybrid custodians offer user-friendly platforms, multi-user access, and support, making asset management more accessible.

4. Regulatory and Compliance Considerations

Choose a custodian that meets licensing, AML/KYC, and data protection requirements. Regulated custody providers simplify compliance and support audit-ready reporting.

5. Cost vs. Value

Compare fees, transaction costs, and value-added services such as insurance and reporting. The right custody solution balances cost efficiency with strong security and service quality.

A few factors to consider when choosing the right crypto custodian include:

• Due Diligence: Reputable custodians undergo regular audits, such as SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications for operational security, and proof-of-reserves for asset verification. In combination, they validate their security practices and solvency. Look for third-party attestation reports confirming asset segregation.
• Risk Assessment: Understand vulnerabilities associated with your holdings and choose a custodian with strong mitigation strategies.
• Future Growth Alignment: Ensure the custody solution supports diversified or evolving portfolios, including multiple cryptocurrencies or tokenised assets.
• Hands-On Testing: Wherever possible, test the platform for usability, accessibility, and operational convenience before committing.

As digital assets mature, cryptocurrency custody is evolving from basic storage into a strategic pillar for investors and institutions. The future will be defined by advances in multi-party hybrid crypto custody models, advanced private key management, and robust secure crypto storage that meet both operational needs and regulatory compliance in crypto custody.

By choosing the right model—whether self-custody, qualified third-party, or hybrid—you can ensure your digital wealth remains protected while enabling participation in the evolving crypto economy.

FAQs:

Q1. What are custody services in crypto?

Crypto custody services are secure solutions for storing and managing digital assets by protecting the private keys that grant access to them. Depending on your needs as an investor, custody can be self-custody, third-party custody, or a hybrid crypto custody model.

Professional crypto custody providers use cold storage for digital assets, multi-signature wallets, hardware security modules (HSMs), and multi-party computation (MPC) to ensure secure crypto storage and regulatory compliance.

Q2. What does regulated crypto custody mean for financial institutions?
Regulated crypto custody ensures that digital asset custody follows financial and compliance standards such as AML/KYC and licensing laws. For institutions, it provides institutional-grade security, strong private key management, and regulatory compliance in crypto custody, allowing safe participation in digital asset markets.

Q3. What are the benefits of using an institutional crypto custody solution
Institutional crypto custody solutions provide advanced crypto asset security through cold storage, multi-signature wallets, and HSMs. They ensure regulatory compliance in crypto custody, often offer insurance coverage (though limits and exclusions vary), and support transparent auditing, ideal for institutions seeking secure crypto storage and credibility in the digital asset market.

Q4. How do I choose the right crypto custodian for my digital assets?
To choose the right crypto custodian, assess your operational requirements, technical capability, and compliance requirements. Compare self-custody, qualified third-party, and hybrid crypto custody models. Trustworthy crypto custody providers should demonstrate strong private key management, robust security, and best practices for crypto storage.

Disclaimer

This document has been prepared by AMINA Bank AG (“AMINA”) in Switzerland. AMINA is a Swiss licensed bank and securities dealer with its head office and legal domicile in Switzerland. It is authorized and regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (“FINMA”).

This document is published solely for educational purposes; it is not an advertisement nor a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any financial investment or to participate in any particular investment strategy. This document is for publication only on AMINA website, blog, and AMINA social media accounts as permitted by applicable law. It is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or would subject AMINA to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction.

Research will initiate, update and cease coverage solely at the discretion of AMINA. This document is based on various sources, incl. AMINA ones. In preparing this document, AMINA may have made limited use of artificial intelligence-enabled tools to assist with research, summarisation, and drafting, with all content subject to human review and validation.

No representation or warranty, either express or implied, is provided in relation to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information contained in this document, except with respect to information concerning AMINA. The information is not intended to be a complete statement or summary of the subjects alluded to in the document, whereas general information, financial investments, markets or developments. AMINA does not undertake to update or keep current information. Any statements contained in this document attributed to a third party represent AMINA’s interpretation of the data, information and/or opinions provided by that third party either publicly or through a subscription service, and such use and interpretation have not been reviewed by the third party.

Any formulas, equations, or prices stated in this document are for informational or explanatory purposes only and do not represent valuations for individual investments. There is no representation that any transaction can or could have been affected at those formulas, equations, or prices, and any formula(s), equation(s), or price(s) do not necessarily reflect AMINA’s internal books and records or theoretical model-based valuations and may be based on certain assumptions. Different assumptions by AMINA or any other source may yield substantially different results.

Nothing in this document constitutes a representation that any investment strategy or investment is suitable or appropriate to an investor’s individual circumstances or otherwise constitutes a personal recommendation. Investments involve risks, and investors should exercise prudence and their own judgment in making their investment decisions. Financial investments described in the document may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. Certain services and products are subject to legal restrictions and cannot be offered on an unrestricted basis to certain investors. Recipients are therefore asked to consult the restrictions relating to investments, products or services for further information. Furthermore, recipients may consult their legal/tax advisors should they require any clarifications.

At any time, investment decisions (including, among others, deposit, buy, sell or hold investments) made by AMINA and its employees may differ from or be contrary to the opinions expressed in AMINA research publications.

This document may not be reproduced, or copies circulated without prior authority of AMINA. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, AMINA expressly prohibits the distribution and transfer of this document to third parties for any reason. AMINA accepts no liability whatsoever for any claims or lawsuits from any third parties arising from the use or distribution of this document.

©2026 AMINA, Kolinplatz 15, 6300 Zug