Beyond RWA Tokenization: Real-Time Settlement in Infrastructure Finance

Financial systems historically process events in batches. Tokenised systems process events as they occur. When finance operates at the speed of production, liquidity ceases to be a market condition and becomes an infrastructural property.

The significance of tokenisation is therefore not that assets move onchain. It is that accounting moves into real time.

The most significant implementations are emerging not in speculative trading environments but in industrial capital formation. One such example emerged from ETHZilla Aerospace (a tokenised aviation leasing platform providing blockchain-based exposure to aircraft cash flows) that has structured tokenised exposure to aviation equipment cash flows. Another example is Aave Horizon (an institutional RWA lending framework enabling interaction between DeFi liquidity and tokenised productive infrastructure) that enables lending markets to interact with tokenised productive infrastructure. These initiatives do not expand the investable universe. They increase the operational frequency of capital.

The defining innovation is therefore not fractional ownership, liquidity creation or retail accessibility. It is the compression of time between economic production and financial recognition.

Tokenisation should therefore be analysed as a balance sheet efficiency technology.

Across aviation leasing, energy infrastructure and automated production, the same inefficiency appears repeatedly. Financial settlement operates slower than economic production.

This creates a structural requirement for liquidity buffers and reserve capital. These buffers do not finance growth. They finance waiting.

Tokenised settlement compresses waiting time.
Reduced waiting reduces idle capital.
Reduced idle capital increases economic throughput.

The result resembles an expansion of financial capacity without expansion of monetary supply.

Tokenisation therefore functions as a systemic efficiency multiplier.

For capital allocators, tokenisation should not be evaluated as exposure to a technology sector. It should be evaluated as exposure to changes in capital efficiency.

Assets whose value depends on settlement speed benefit first. These include infrastructure debt, equipment leasing and trade receivables. Assets driven primarily by scarcity characteristics benefit later.

The investable theme is therefore not digitised securities but accelerated balance sheets.

Protocols and platforms enabling collateral mobility and state synchronisation represent infrastructure providers rather than speculative assets.

Digital asset markets have historically interpreted tokenization as a distribution mechanism. The assumption is that blockchain allows more investors to access the same assets.

The current wave of institutional adoption suggests the opposite motivation. The primary constraint in infrastructure finance is not investor access but capital turnover. An aircraft engine produces revenue continuously. A solar installation also generates electricity continuously. An automated production system manufactures goods continuously.

Traditional finance recognises this value discretely – through reporting cycles, refinancing windows and settlement processes. During these intervals capital remains economically productive but financially static.

Tokenised systems align accounting speed with production speed. Liquidity therefore becomes a by-product of synchronisation rather than the objective of digitisation.

Aircraft equipment financing illustrates why tokenisation emerged first in specific asset classes.

Global mobility creates a mismatch between physical reality and financial record keeping. Legal frameworks such as the Cape Town Convention (an international treaty establishing creditor rights and asset repossession frameworks for cross-border aircraft and mobile equipment financing) ensure enforceability, yet operational processes remain slow due to reconciliation across registries, custodians and intermediaries.

ETHZilla Aerospace structured exposure to leased CFM56 engines while preserving the legal hierarchy of international interests. The blockchain component does not replace contractual rights. It removes the time required to confirm them.

Ownership state, income entitlement and collateral eligibility update simultaneously rather than sequentially.

The asset was never economically illiquid.

It was administratively delayed.

Tokenisation converted legal certainty into financial immediacy.

The financing challenge of the energy transition is frequently described as a shortage of capital. Evidence increasingly suggests a shortage of capital mobility.

Solar projects generate predictable long-duration cash flows, yet development pipelines slow because equity remains trapped inside completed installations. Secondary transactions are infrequent and refinancing cycles are measured in years.

Aave Horizon introduces an architecture in which operating infrastructure can serve as continuously pledgeable collateral. Borrowing capacity updates as economic activity occurs rather than when refinancing events take place.

The consequence is multiplicative deployment of the same balance sheet.
Capital finances capacity repeatedly instead of sequentially.

Tokenisation therefore does not primarily lower the cost of energy financing.
It increases the speed at which energy capacity can be financed.

This distinction underpins the concept of abundance assets. Production expands because financial time contracts.

Automation infrastructure extends this logic further, introducing a structural shift in settlement speed as well as how creditworthiness is determined.

Historically, lending has relied on static representations of borrower strength. Balance sheets are reported periodically while productive activity occurs continuously. Lenders compensate for uncertainty with conservative leverage and higher pricing.

Telemetry anchored to neutral settlement infrastructure allows operational output to function as collateral evidence. GPU clusters, robotic systems and automated facilities produce verifiable performance streams that can be incorporated into risk models in real time.

Creditworthiness transitions from ownership based assessment to activity based assessment.

Finance begins underwriting behaviour rather than declarations.

The adoption pattern also clarifies a persistent misunderstanding. Tokenised finance does not displace legal systems. It depends on them.

Legal frameworks such as the Cape Town Convention provide enforceable priority of claims. Securities regulations govern trading venues. Stablecoin legislation defines settlement finality. Blockchain infrastructure synchronises state across participants.

Law defines rights.
Code defines timing.

The convergence of the two produces programmable enforceability rather than decentralised replacement.

The long term impact is structural rather than sectoral. Financial markets historically separated execution, clearing, settlement and custody to manage trust. Tokenised infrastructure collapses these functions into a unified state system.

Risk management therefore migrates from reconciliation after a transaction to validation during a transaction.

The primary competitive advantage in future financial systems becomes operational continuity rather than trading volume.

Institutions capable of operating at continuous accounting frequency will intermediate a disproportionate share of global capital flows.

Over the next five years financial markets are likely to transition from periodic to continuous accounting in selected institutional environments. The earliest full adoption is expected in collateral intensive markets where settlement delay determines leverage capacity.

Within a decade, tokenised settlement layers may influence monetary policy transmission by altering the effective velocity of capital without altering nominal supply.

The impact will not appear as a discrete technological revolution but as a gradual compression of financial time across markets.

Tokenisation is not best understood as the digitisation of assets. It is the synchronisation of finance with economic reality.

ETHZilla Aerospace demonstrates how mobile industrial capital becomes immediately financeable. Aave Horizon demonstrates how productive infrastructure becomes continuously collateralised. Automation networks demonstrate how activity becomes credit.

The common denominator is not blockchain adoption.
It is the elimination of financial waiting.

Disclaimer – Research and Educational Content

This document has been prepared by AMINA Bank AG (“AMINA”). AMINA is a Swiss licensed bank and securities dealer with its head office and legal domicile in Switzerland. It is authorized and regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (“FINMA”).

This document is published solely for educational purposes; it is not an advertisement nor a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any financial investment or to participate in any particular investment strategy. This document is for publication only on AMINA website, blog, and AMINA social media accounts as permitted by applicable law. It is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or would subject AMINA to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction.

Research will initiate, update and cease coverage solely at the discretion of AMINA. This document is based on various sources, incl. AMINA ones.  In preparing this document, AMINA may have made limited use of artificial intelligence–enabled tools to assist with research, summarisation, and drafting, with all content subject to human review and validation.

No representation or warranty, either express or implied, is provided in relation to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information contained in this document, except with respect to information concerning AMINA. The information is not intended to be a complete statement or summary of the subjects alluded to in the document, whereas general information, financial investments, markets or developments. AMINA does not undertake to update or keep current information. Any statements contained in this document attributed to a third party represent AMINA’s interpretation of the data, information and/or opinions provided by that third party either publicly or through a subscription service, and such use and interpretation have not been reviewed by the third party.

Any formulas, equations, or prices stated in this document are for informational or explanatory purposes only and do not represent valuations for individual investments. There is no representation that any transaction can or could have been affected at those formulas, equations, or prices, and any formula(s), equation(s), or price(s) do not necessarily reflect AMINA’s internal books and records or theoretical model-based valuations and may be based on certain assumptions. Different assumptions by AMINA or any other source may yield substantially different results.

Nothing in this document constitutes a representation that any investment strategy or investment is suitable or appropriate to an investor’s individual circumstances or otherwise constitutes a personal recommendation. Investments involve risks, and investors should exercise prudence and their own judgment in making their investment decisions. Financial investments described in the document may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. Certain services and products are subject to legal restrictions and cannot be offered on an unrestricted basis to certain investors. Recipients are therefore asked to consult the restrictions relating to investments, products or services for further information. Furthermore, recipients may consult their legal/tax advisors should they require any clarifications.

At any time, investment decisions (including, among others, deposit, buy, sell or hold investments) made by AMINA and its employees may differ from or be contrary to the opinions expressed in AMINA research publications.

This document may not be reproduced, or copies circulated without prior authority of AMINA. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, AMINA expressly prohibits the distribution and transfer of this document to third parties for any reason. AMINA accepts no liability whatsoever for any claims or lawsuits from any third parties arising from the use or distribution of this document.

©2026 AMINA, Kolinplatz 15, 6300 Zug