Private Credit 2026: Growth and Risks

Private credit has spent a decade scaling into a $2 trillion asset class. Between late 2025 and March 2026, it faced its first genuine stress test. Redemption pressure surged across several flagship funds.

BlackRock’s HLEND vehicle received redemption requests exceeding 9 percent of net asset value. The fund enforced its quarterly cap, allowing only around 5 percent to be withdrawn while deferring the remainder.

Blackstone’s BCRED also faced nearly $3.7 billion in redemption requests. Rather than strictly gating withdrawals, the firm injected capital, adjusted redemption limits, and selectively sold assets to meet demand while preserving investor confidence.

Blue Owl encountered pressure across multiple vehicles, particularly those with exposure to consumer and specialty finance. In response, it executed large secondary sales and even conducted share buybacks exceeding typical redemption limits in certain cases.

Default rates in private credit, which were running at 3–4% earlier this year, have accelerated to approximately 8–9%, and UBS projects they will climb toward 15% by the second half of 2026.

Liquidity in private credit is not intrinsic. It is conditional and managed.

What makes these events worth watching is that private credit stress emerges alongside $100 oil, a structural dollar rally, collapsing rate-cut expectations, and central banks paralysed between growth and inflation. All of these make for an anatomy of a systemic event.

At a headline level, portfolios remain largely composed of senior secured loans. Yet the credit cycle has clearly turned.

The increasing use of payment-in-kind interest signals borrower stress. Interest coverage ratios are gradually declining as higher rates pressure cash flow. Leverage levels remain elevated, often in the range of five to seven times EBITDA.

More importantly, the concept of the “true” default rate has gained prominence. When restructuring activity, maturity extensions, and covenant adjustments are considered, the level of underlying distress appears meaningfully higher than reported defaults alone.

The most significant forward risk lies in the refinancing wall. More than $620 billion in debt is approaching maturity between 2026 and 2028. Much of this was issued in a low-rate environment and will now need to be refinanced at materially higher costs.

In the years following the Global Financial Crisis, banking regulation made it increasingly inefficient for banks to lend to leveraged and mid-market borrowers.

In the decade that followed, private credit market has crossed $2 trillion and is advancing steadily towards $4 to $4.5 trillion by the end of the decade. It has evolved into a parallel system of credit intermediation operating alongside, and in some areas ahead of — traditional banking.

What makes this transformation particularly striking is its breadth. Private credit now finances everything from sponsor-backed buyouts to infrastructure and increasingly complex refinancing cycles.

From Bank Balance Sheets to Direct Lending

Private credit is, in essence, the removal of banks from the lending equation. Investors provide capital directly to borrowers through specialised managers who originate, structure, and monitor loans.

This shift has profound implications. Without the constraints of regulatory capital requirements or syndicated distribution, private credit lenders can move faster, customise terms, and take on structures that would be inefficient for banks.

Over time, this model has scaled beyond its original mid-market focus. Transactions that once required large bank syndicates are now routinely financed by private credit platforms. The appeal for borrowers lies in certainty. The appeal for investors lies in yield and control.

The Role of Large Platforms

The modern private credit market is increasingly dominated by scaled platforms such as Blackstone, BlackRock, Apollo, and Blue Owl. These are global credit institutions, controlling origination pipelines, investor distribution and permanent capital pools that allow them to underwrite, hold and recycle risk at a scale historically reserved for banks.

Blackstone’s BCRED has become one of the largest private credit vehicles globally, serving as a flagship for wealth-distributed credit exposure. BlackRock, following its integration of HPS, now operates a vast credit platform spanning both institutional and private wealth channels. Blue Owl has carved out a strong position in technology and sponsor-backed lending, particularly through its permanent capital structures.

These platforms possess three structural advantages. They control distribution, they control origination, and they operate with permanent or semi-permanent capital. This combination allows them to deploy capital at scale while maintaining consistent deal flow.

As competition intensifies in corporate lending, private credit managers are increasingly expanding into asset-backed finance.

This includes lending against data centres, infrastructure, consumer loan portfolios, and equipment leasing structures. The appeal lies in diversification and collateral strength. Rather than relying on a single corporate borrower, lenders gain exposure to pools of assets.

This shift reflects both opportunity and necessity. Corporate direct lending has become crowded. The issue isn’t a lack of loan demand—borrowers still seek capital—but rather an excess of investor capital flooding private credit funds, outpacing the available high-quality direct lending deals.

Asset-backed finance offers a new frontier for capital deployment, albeit with added structural complexity. This shift is primarily demand – driven, as traditional banks continue to retreat from capital-intensive lending segments while borrowers in areas such as infrastructure, consumer credit and digital assets require large, flexible financing solutions that private credit is uniquely positioned to provide.

The integration of private credit with distributed ledger technology marks a structural turning point rather than a technological curiosity.

As of March 2026, tokenised real-world assets excluding stablecoins have reached $27.05 billion, with private credit representing a rapidly growing component of this market. On-chain private lending alone has crossed $20 billion, signalling that the model has moved beyond experimentation.

The early phase of tokenisation focused on representation. Tokens acted as digital wrappers for off-chain assets. The current phase is fundamentally different. It is defined by distribution.

Loans are increasingly being structured so that the token itself carries enforceable economic rights. This allows for fractional ownership, programmable cash flows, and integration into broader financial systems.

Institutional platforms are at the centre of this transition. BlackRock’s involvement through tokenised fund structures, alongside platforms such as Securitize and Centrifuge, reflects a clear shift towards institutional adoption. Protocol-level developments, particularly in systems like Aave’s institutional markets, are creating frameworks where private credit can interact with decentralised liquidity without compromising risk isolation.

Tokenisation does not eliminate illiquidity. What it does is create new layers around it. Secondary trading venues, atomic settlement mechanisms, and programmable redemption processes are gradually reducing friction in private markets.

However, the events of early 2026 highlighted an important dynamic. Transparency accelerates behaviour. When valuations and flows become visible in near real time, investor reactions compress. Tokenisation increases efficiency, but it also increases the speed at which stress can propagate.

To support institutional participation, the industry has developed frameworks ensuring that digital tokens accurately reflect legal rights. Without this alignment, tokenisation would remain superficial. With it, it becomes credible financial infrastructure.

Regulation has played a decisive role in this transition. Frameworks in both the United States and Europe have provided the clarity required for institutional capital to engage at scale. The shift from uncertainty to enforceability has been a prerequisite for growth.

Private credit has crossed a threshold. It is no longer an alternative asset class competing for allocation. It is infrastructure.

It finances companies, supports economic expansion, and increasingly interacts with digital financial systems. It has grown massively, adapted its structures, and continued to scale.

But it shows signs of stress. In 2008, the distance between Private Credit redemption caps and defaults closed faster than markets expected. The sequence today is not identical, but it rhymes closely enough to warrant more caution than current risk asset pricing reflects.

The question is no longer whether stress is building. It is how quickly it spreads.

Disclaimer – Research and Educational Content

This document has been prepared by AMINA Bank AG (“AMINA”). AMINA is a Swiss licensed bank and securities dealer with its head office and legal domicile in Switzerland. It is authorised and regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (“FINMA”).

This document is published solely for educational purposes; it is not an advertisement nor a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any financial investment or to participate in any particular investment strategy. This document is for publication only on AMINA website, blog, and AMINA social media accounts as permitted by applicable law. It is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or would subject AMINA to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction.

Research will initiate, update and cease coverage solely at the discretion of AMINA. This document is based on various sources, incl. AMINA ones.  In preparing this document, AMINA may have made limited use of artificial intelligence–enabled tools to assist with research, summarisation, and drafting, with all content subject to human review and validation.

No representation or warranty, either express or implied, is provided in relation to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information contained in this document, except with respect to information concerning AMINA. The information is not intended to be a complete statement or summary of the subjects alluded to in the document, whereas general information, financial investments, markets or developments. AMINA does not undertake to update or keep current information. Any statements contained in this document attributed to a third party represent AMINA’s interpretation of the data, information and/or opinions provided by that third party either publicly or through a subscription service, and such use and interpretation have not been reviewed by the third party.

Any formulas, equations, or prices stated in this document are for informational or explanatory purposes only and do not represent valuations for individual investments. There is no representation that any transaction can or could have been affected at those formulas, equations, or prices, and any formula(s), equation(s), or price(s) do not necessarily reflect AMINA’s internal books and records or theoretical model-based valuations and may be based on certain assumptions. Different assumptions by AMINA or any other source may yield substantially different results.

Nothing in this document constitutes a representation that any investment strategy or investment is suitable or appropriate to an investor’s individual circumstances or otherwise constitutes a personal recommendation. Investments involve risks, and investors should exercise prudence and their own judgment in making their investment decisions. Financial investments described in the document may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. Certain services and products are subject to legal restrictions and cannot be offered on an unrestricted basis to certain investors. Recipients are therefore asked to consult the restrictions relating to investments, products or services for further information. Furthermore, recipients may consult their legal/tax advisors should they require any clarifications.

At any time, investment decisions (including, among others, deposit, buy, sell or hold investments) made by AMINA and its employees may differ from or be contrary to the opinions expressed in AMINA research publications.

This document may not be reproduced, or copies circulated without prior authority of AMINA. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, AMINA expressly prohibits the distribution and transfer of this document to third parties for any reason. AMINA accepts no liability whatsoever for any claims or lawsuits from any third parties arising from the use or distribution of this document.

©2026 AMINA, Kolinplatz 15, 6300 Zug