What Are Real-World Assets (RWAs)? Benefits, Uses and the Future of Tokenised Finance

For much of blockchain’s early history, attention centred on cryptocurrencies. Today, however, a new trend is gaining momentum across financial markets: the tokenisation of real-world assets (RWAs). Governments, banks, asset managers and technology providers are exploring ways to bring traditional assets onto blockchain infrastructure, creating digital representations of assets that already exist in the physical or financial world.

Real-world assets can include everything from government bonds and money market funds to real estate, commodities, private credit and infrastructure projects. Rather than creating entirely new investment products, RWA tokenisation focuses on improving how existing assets are issued, owned, transferred or managed.

One of the most widely referenced examples is BlackRock’s BUIDL fund (launched in 2024), a tokenised money market fund issued on blockchain infrastructure. It demonstrated how a traditional financial product could be represented digitally while maintaining exposure to real-world assets such as cash and US Treasury bills. [1]

As infrastructure matures and regulatory frameworks continue to evolve, many industry participants may view RWAs as one of the most practical and potentially transformative blockchain applications today.

• Real-world assets (RWAs) are physical or financial assets that exist outside blockchain networks but can be represented digitally on blockchain infrastructure.
• Common examples include bonds, money market funds, real estate, precious metals, carbon credits and private credit investments.
• RWA tokenisation seeks to improve efficiency, transparency and accessibility while maintaining links to underlying assets, though it does not remove the investment, liquidity, or regulatory risks of the underlying asset.
• Institutional adoption is focused on tokenised treasuries, money market funds and private market investments rather than purely speculative digital assets.

Real-world assets are assets that derive their value from economic activity outside blockchain ecosystems. They can be financial instruments, physical assets or contractual rights that exist independently of distributed ledger technology.

Examples include:

• Government bonds
• Corporate bonds
• Money market funds
• Equities
• Commercial and residential real estate
• Gold and silver
• Carbon credits
• Private credit funds
• Infrastructure investments
• Investment fund units

The concept of tokenising traditional assets started gaining attention in the late 2010s. Initially, most projects were experimental and focused on demonstrating how ownership rights could be represented digitally on a blockchain. As the technology matured and institutions became more involved, the focus shifted towards practical applications that could improve investment operations and asset servicing.

Today, RWAs are no longer viewed as a niche blockchain concept. Instead, they are increasingly seen as an emerging layer of financial market infrastructure that may help modernise asset ownership, settlement and administration.

The RWA ecosystem spans a wide range of asset classes. While each category serves a different purpose, all share the common characteristic of linking digital tokens to underlying real-world value.

Financial assets

Financial RWAs include traditional investment products such as government bonds, corporate bonds, treasury products, money market funds and public equities. These assets represent a significant share of institutional tokenisation activity to date.

For example, tokenised money market funds allow investors to access familiar short-term investment products through blockchain-based infrastructure while maintaining exposure to underlying cash and treasury holdings.

Real estate

Property has long been considered one of the most promising use cases for tokenisation. By dividing ownership into digital units, real estate tokenisation can potentially make property investment more accessible and efficient.

Examples include:

• Commercial office buildings
• Residential developments
• Real estate investment funds
• Property-backed investment vehicles
• Commodities

Physical commodities such as gold, silver and carbon credits can also be represented digitally on blockchain infrastructure. Tokenisation provides a transparent ownership record while preserving the connection to the underlying asset. The actual functioning and rights associated with digitised commodities depend on the relevant legal arrangements.

Private markets

Private credit and private equity are increasingly attracting interest within the RWA sector. These markets can involve more complex ownership structures and administration processes, creating opportunities for digital infrastructure to improve efficiency and reporting.

Alternative assets

Beyond traditional financial products, tokenisation is expanding into newer categories including:

• Carbon credits
  For example, a company that plants forests can tokenise the carbon credits it earns, allowing investors to buy and trade them digitally.
• Intellectual property rights
  For example, ownership rights to a hit song or a patented technology can be tokenised, allowing investors to earn a share of future royalties.
• Luxury goods
  For example, a rare Rolex watch or a limited-edition Hermès Birkin bag can be tokenised, enabling multiple investors to own a fraction of the asset.
• Fine art
  For example, a Picasso or Banksy artwork can be divided into digital tokens, allowing investors to purchase a portion of the piece rather than the entire artwork.
• Infrastructure projects
  For example, a solar farm, wind park, or toll road project can be tokenised to raise capital from a wider pool of investors.

Many of these applications remain in early stages of development. Legal structures, valuation methodologies, and secondary-market liquidity vary significantly across these categories.

These assets demonstrate the flexibility of tokenisation across diverse investment sectors.

Improved access to investments

Some tokenised asset structures may support fractional ownership, enabling investors to gain exposure to portions of an asset rather than purchasing it outright. This can broaden participation in asset classes that may otherwise require significant capital.

Greater transparency

Blockchain technology provides a digital ledger that records asset ownership and transactions. This may improve visibility into asset movements, ownership records and transaction histories.

Operational efficiency

Traditional investment ecosystems often rely on multiple intermediaries and manual processes. Tokenisation can streamline aspects of issuance, settlement, transfer and record-keeping by consolidating activities onto a shared digital infrastructure.

Potentially faster settlement

Some tokenised investment structures are designed to reduce settlement times compared to traditional market processes. While not all products settle instantly, blockchain infrastructure can support more efficient transaction processing.

Enhanced asset distribution

Tokenisation can support new distribution models by enabling digital issuance and ownership records, potentially helping institutions reach broader investor audiences while operating within existing regulatory frameworks.

Considerations: these benefits relate to how ownership is recorded and transferred, not to the risk of the underlying asset itself. Market, credit, liquidity, and valuation risk remain tied to the asset being tokenised, and secondary-market liquidity for tokenised structures can still be limited depending on the product and jurisdiction and applicable law.

RWA tokenisation refers to the process of creating a blockchain-based representation of a real-world asset while preserving the legal and economic rights associated with that asset. The resulting token serves as a digital representation of ownership, entitlement or exposure.

For institutions, tokenisation is not merely about digitising ownership records. It represents an opportunity to modernise the full asset lifecycle, from issuance and investor onboarding to settlement, reporting and asset servicing.

• Current institutional use cases include:
• Tokenised government treasuries
• Tokenised money market funds
• Tokenised fund shares
• Private credit products
• Collateral management solutions
• Tokenised deposits and cash equivalents

Increasingly, institutions view tokenisation as an infrastructure improvement rather than a separate asset class. The goal is often to enhance efficiency while maintaining familiar investment exposures and regulatory standards.

Institutional adoption depends on far more than blockchain technology alone. To support regulated financial activity, tokenised assets require robust operational, legal and governance frameworks.

Regulatory and legal certainty

Clear legal ownership rights and regulatory compliance frameworks remain fundamental. Tokenisation does not change the legal nature of an asset=.

Institutional custody

Secure and regulated custody solutions help safeguard digital ownership records while supporting investor protection and operational resilience. As with any custody arrangement, no solution removes risk entirely — the level of protection depends on the specific provider and safeguards in place.

Compliance and onboarding controls

Institutional platforms typically require investor verification, KYC procedures, AML controls and transfer restrictions where applicable.

Governance and reporting

Auditability, operational governance, reporting standards and risk management frameworks are all critical components of institutional-grade infrastructure.

Market infrastructure

Issuance platforms, secondary trading venues, transfer agents and liquidity mechanisms all contribute to a functioning institutional RWA ecosystem.

It is important to note that many tokenised securities, commodities and real estate products are themselves subsets of the broader RWA market because they ultimately derive value from real-world underlying assets.

While RWAs introduce potential operational benefits, investors should carefully assess several risk factors before considering allocating such products.

Real-world assets represent one of the most significant developments in the evolution of digital finance. Rather than replacing traditional investments, RWAs seek to modernise how those investments are issued, managed and transferred.

The sector has evolved from early experimentation to increasingly sophisticated institutional use cases across treasury products, money market funds, private credit and alternative investments. As custody infrastructure, regulatory frameworks and market standards continue to mature, RWAs may play an increasingly important role in the future of global financial markets.

For investors and institutions alike, understanding RWAs is becoming essential. Whether through tokenised funds, real estate, commodities or private markets, real-world assets are helping bridge traditional finance and blockchain technology, creating new possibilities for how financial assets may be owned, administered and accessed in the years ahead.

However, as with any opportunities, risks, liquidity, eligibility requirements and regulatory considerations should be assessed carefully before investing.

What are real-world assets (RWAs)?

RWAs are physical or financial assets that exist outside blockchain networks but can be represented digitally on blockchain infrastructure. Examples include bonds, real estate, commodities and investment funds.

Are RWAs the same as cryptocurrencies?

No. Cryptocurrencies are typically native to blockchain networks, while RWAs derive their value from underlying real-world assets such as bonds, property or commodities.

What are examples of RWAs?

Examples include money market funds, government bonds, corporate bonds, gold, silver, carbon credits, private credit investments and real estate.

Why are institutions interested in RWAs?

Institutions are exploring RWAs because they may support operational efficiency, improved transparency, enhanced distribution capabilities and more streamlined asset servicing. As with any financial product, institutions assess these potential benefits alongside investment, regulatory, and operational risks.

Are RWAs regulated?

The underlying assets generally remain subject to existing regulations. Tokenisation changes how assets are represented and administered, but not necessarily their regulatory classification.

What is the difference between RWAs and tokenised securities?

Tokenised securities are a subset of RWAs. While all tokenised securities are linked to real-world assets, RWAs also include categories such as commodities, real estate and alternative assets.

Disclaimer, Research and Educational Content

This document has been prepared by AMINA Bank AG (“AMINA”). AMINA is a Swiss licensed bank and securities dealer with its head office and legal domicile in Switzerland. It is authorised and regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (“FINMA”).

This document is published solely for educational purposes; it is not an advertisement nor a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any financial investment or to participate in any particular investment strategy. This document is for publication only on AMINA website, blog, and AMINA social media accounts as permitted by applicable law. It is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or would subject AMINA to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction.

Research will initiate, update and cease coverage solely at the discretion of AMINA. This document is based on various sources, incl. AMINA ones. In preparing this document, AMINA may have made limited use of artificial intelligence enabled tools to assist with research, summarisation, and drafting, with all content subject to human review and validation.

No representation or warranty, either express or implied, is provided in relation to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information contained in this document, except with respect to information concerning AMINA. The information is not intended to be a complete statement or summary of the subjects alluded to in the document, whereas general information, financial investments, markets or developments. AMINA does not undertake to update or keep current information. Any statements contained in this document attributed to a third party represent AMINA’s interpretation of the data, information and/or opinions provided by that third party either publicly or through a subscription service, and such use and interpretation have not been reviewed by the third party.

Any formulas, equations, or prices stated in this document are for informational or explanatory purposes only and do not represent valuations for individual investments. There is no representation that any transaction can or could have been affected at those formulas, equations, or prices, and any formula(s), equation(s), or price(s) do not necessarily reflect AMINA’s internal books and records or theoretical model based valuations and may be based on certain assumptions. Different assumptions by AMINA or any other source may yield substantially different results.

Nothing in this document constitutes a representation that any investment strategy or investment is suitable or appropriate to an investor’s individual circumstances or otherwise constitutes a personal recommendation. Investments involve risks, and investors should exercise prudence and their own judgment in making their investment decisions. Financial investments described in the document may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. Certain services and products are subject to legal restrictions and cannot be offered on an unrestricted basis to certain investors. Recipients are therefore asked to consult the restrictions relating to investments, products or services for further information. Furthermore, recipients may consult their legal/tax advisors should they require any clarifications.

At any time, investment decisions (including, among others, deposit, buy, sell or hold investments) made by AMINA and its employees may differ from or be contrary to the opinions expressed in AMINA research publications.

This document may not be reproduced, or copies circulated without prior authority of AMINA. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, AMINA expressly prohibits the distribution and transfer of this document to third parties for any reason. AMINA accepts no liability whatsoever for any claims or lawsuits from any third parties arising from the use or distribution of this document.

©2026 AMINA, Kolinplatz 15, 6300 Zug