From VASP to MiCA Licensing: What the end of the transition period could likely mean for crypto investors

The MiCA transition period has ended. As of July 1, 2026, crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) operating in the European Union must comply with the harmonised Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation across all EU Member States. While some firms have already secured their MiCA authorisation, reports suggest ~80% other firms remain in the licensing process. Some providers may have adjusted, limited, or suspended certain services pending approval.

For investors, this could mark one of the most significant milestones in the evolution of the European digital asset market.

If your assets are held with a provider that has not yet obtained a MiCA authorisation, you may be wondering what happens next. Can you continue trading or accessing custody services? Do you need to move your holdings elsewhere?

This guide explains what has changed from VASP to MiCA, what you could expect in practice, and general factors to consider when assessing digital asset providers in the EU’s new MiCA era.

The rules governing crypto-asset service providers under MiCA have applied since 30 December 2024, while the framework for Asset-Referenced Tokens (ARTs) and E-Money Tokens (EMTs) has applied since 30 June 2024. The transitional period was designed to allow existing providers operating under national regulatory regimes sufficient time to move into the new European framework.

Now that transition has ended:

• MiCA-authorised providers are positioned to offer regulated crypto-asset services based on their National Competent Authority’s specific authorisation across the EU.
• Providers that have not yet obtained authorisation will face restrictions depending on their circumstances and applicable national rules.
• Investors increasingly have access to a more harmonised regulatory environment across Europe.
• Regulatory status has become an important factor of how a crypto business is governed, supervised, and operated.

For most investors, the practical implications matter more than the details of the legislation itself. However, the legislation is a crucial regulatory development and is also the driver of innovation in the digital asset space across the EU.

In most cases, you should receive communications directly from your provider regarding any changes resulting from MiCA implementation.

If your provider is already authorised under MiCA, there should be minimal to no disruption to the services you receive – subject to the specific authorisation they have been granted.

The key consideration is transparency. Investors should expect clear communication regarding how assets are held, safeguarded, and administered.

If a provider modifies its operating model, restructures services, or ceases certain activities, you may be offered alternative arrangements or asked to transfer holdings to another authorised entity.

Before transferring assets or acting on any communication, investors should:

• Verify the communication through official provider channels
• Avoid clicking links from unsolicited messages
• Independently confirm the regulatory status and identity of the receiving entity

Where such changes occur, providers should communicate clearly regarding timelines, available options, and next steps.

Not all providers will offer the same digital asset experience, even within a common regulatory framework. Based on your own evaluation and needs, consider the following checklist when assessing a crypto asset partner.

1. MiCA authorisation
   Has the provider obtained MiCA authorisation? Authorisation demonstrates that a provider has likely met specific regulatory requirements relating to governance, compliance, and operational standards.
2. Institutional-grade crypto custody
   Crypto custody remains one of the key operational aspect that any digital asset investor will need to assess. Crypto theft hit $3.4 billion in 2025, followed by $771.8 million stolen in just the first four and a half months of 2026 — reinforcing that reliable custody is becoming essential infrastructure rather than optional.

   The important factors to consider when choosing the right provider go beyond basic storage. Consider evaluating segregated client asset arrangements, robust security architecture, and strong safeguarding controls, backed by comprehensive operational procedures and institutional-grade custody infrastructure. Together, these factors may help investors assess secure institutional-grade custody solution from one that simply claims to be.

3. Services beyond crypto custodyA strong digital assets service provider should deliver more than custody alone. Based on your requirements and risk appetite – evaluate providers that offer:
   • Support for institutional trading needs
   • Staking (with transparent risk disclosures and withdrawal timelines)
   • Token services
   • Treasury solutions
   • Liquidity access
   • Trading execution quality
   • Settlement efficiency
   • Institutional digital asset infrastructure
4. Strong governance and risk management
   Governance is increasingly becoming a key differentiator. Investors should consider assessing whether a provider demonstrates:
   • Clear organisational structures
   • Independent oversight
   • Risk management frameworks
   • Compliance expertise
   • Transparent policies and procedures
5. Institutional expertise and financial resilience
   As digital assets become more integrated with traditional finance, institutional expertise matters. Some factors to consider:
   • Risk governance
   • Financial controls
   • Operational discipline
   • Long-term stability

   Good governance should also be visible in the client’s onboarding experience. Investors may consider:

   • Clear communication
   • Transparent documentation
   • Responsive support
   • Smooth onboarding processes
   • Ongoing client engagement
6. Security and operational controls
   The post-MiCA environment places growing emphasis on resilience and security. Investors may consider evaluating:
   • Cybersecurity controls
   • Business continuity planning
   • Incident response procedures
   • Operational resilience frameworks
   • Strong internal controls

Rather than viewing regulation as a standalone credential, investors should consider how authorisation intersects with custody capabilities, operational resilience, service breadth, and long-term institutional strength.

These are increasingly the characteristics that distinguish providers in a maturing European market.

With MiCA now enforced fully, the most important change for investors is the emergence of a more mature market where governance, operational resilience, transparency and investor protection are likely to play a central role in how trust is built.

As Europe’s digital asset ecosystem enters its next phase, choosing a MiCA-regulated partner is beginning to be more about selecting a provider with the institutional strength, security standards and long-term commitment necessary to support participation in digital assets over time.

In the MiCA era, providers will not simply offer access to crypto markets. They will consider combining innovation with the qualities investors have long expected from trusted financial institutions: resilience, accountability, and trust.

Q. What is the difference between a VASP and a MiCA-regulated CASP?

A VASP (Virtual Asset Service Provider) typically refers to the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) regulatory framework for crypto-asset service providers, focused on AML/CFT compliance, customer due diligence, and transaction monitoring. A MiCA-regulated CASP typically offers crypto services authorised by the relevant National Competent Authority under EU’s harmonised regulatory framework–MiCA, which includes broader requirements relating to governance, operational resilience, transparency, and investor protection.

Q. Do I need to move my assets if my current provider isn’t MiCA authorised?

The appropriate course of action depends on your provider’s regulatory status, operating model and communications to you. Monitor updates from your provider and understand any changes that may affect crypto services.

Q. Can my VASP continue offering services while waiting for a license?

After 1 July 2026, unauthorised firms cannot legally continue offering MiCA-regulated crypto-asset services within the EU. Providers still in the authorisation process may only continue operations if they meet specific criteria defined by their national regulator or have obtained approval to continue under limited conditions. Being in the authorisation process alone should not be treated as sufficient unless the provider has a valid legal basis under applicable MiCA and national regulatory requirements.

Q. Does the enforcement of MiCAR make digital assets safer?

MiCAR does not eliminate market risk or investment risk. However, it establishes stronger standards around governance, transparency, safeguarding, operational resilience and regulatory oversight, which is likely expected to enhance overall market confidence and investor protection.

Q. What should I look for when choosing a MiCA-regulated crypto asset service provider?

Key considerations may include the following:

• MiCA authorisation
• Custody capabilities
• Security controls
• Governance standards
• Financial resilience
• Trading infrastructure
• Client support
• Breadth of services

Q. Can institutional investors benefit from MiCA?

Greater regulatory certainty may encourage increased institutional participation by providing clearer operating expectations, stronger governance standards and a more consistent framework across European markets.

Q. Does MiCAR apply outside the EU?

MiCAR is an EU regulatory framework and primarily applies within the European Union and, where relevant, the wider EEA ecosystem.

However, because Europe represents one of the world’s largest regulated crypto markets, MiCAR may influence regulatory developments and operating standards in other jurisdictions over time.

Disclaimer
This document has been prepared by AMINA Bank AG (“AMINA”) in Switzerland. AMINA is a Swiss licensed bank and securities dealer with its head office and legal domicile in Switzerland. It is authorized and regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (“FINMA”).

This document is published solely for educational purposes; it is not an advertisement nor a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any financial investment or to participate in any particular investment strategy. This document is for publication only on AMINA website, blog, and AMINA social media accounts as permitted by applicable law. It is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or would subject AMINA to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction.

Research will initiate, update and cease coverage solely at the discretion of AMINA. This document is based on various sources, incl. AMINA ones. In preparing this document, AMINA may have made limited use of artificial intelligence-enabled tools to assist with research, summarisation, and drafting, with all content subject to human review and validation.

No representation or warranty, either express or implied, is provided in relation to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information contained in this document, except with respect to information concerning AMINA. The information is not intended to be a complete statement or summary of the subjects alluded to in the document, whereas general information, financial investments, markets or developments. AMINA does not undertake to update or keep current information. Any statements contained in this document attributed to a third party represent AMINA’s interpretation of the data, information and/or opinions provided by that third party either publicly or through a subscription service, and such use and interpretation have not been reviewed by the third party.

Any formulas, equations, or prices stated in this document are for informational or explanatory purposes only and do not represent valuations for individual investments. There is no representation that any transaction can or could have been affected at those formulas, equations, or prices, and any formula(s), equation(s), or price(s) do not necessarily reflect AMINA’s internal books and records or theoretical model-based valuations and may be based on certain assumptions. Different assumptions by AMINA or any other source may yield substantially different results.

Nothing in this document constitutes a representation that any investment strategy or investment is suitable or appropriate to an investor’s individual circumstances or otherwise constitutes a personal recommendation. Investments involve risks, and investors should exercise prudence and their own judgment in making their investment decisions. Financial investments described in the document may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. Certain services and products are subject to legal restrictions and cannot be offered on an unrestricted basis to certain investors. Recipients are therefore asked to consult the restrictions relating to investments, products or services for further information. Furthermore, recipients may consult their legal/tax advisors should they require any clarifications.

At any time, investment decisions (including, among others, deposit, buy, sell or hold investments) made by AMINA and its employees may differ from or be contrary to the opinions expressed in AMINA research publications.

This document may not be reproduced, or copies circulated without prior authority of AMINA. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, AMINA expressly prohibits the distribution and transfer of this document to third parties for any reason. AMINA accepts no liability whatsoever for any claims or lawsuits from any third parties arising from the use or distribution of this document.

©2026 AMINA, Kolinplatz 15, 6300 Zug